Syllogism Questions are one of the best ways to score in competitive examinations like Banks, Railway, Police, UPSC, SSC. These questions are very simple to solve and score high in the competition.
So first of all let us discuss What is Syllogism and how to solve them quickly.
Table of Contents
What Is Syllogism Question
A logic is a sort of consistent contention that applies deductive thinking to come to an end result dependent on at least two recommendations that are attested or thought to be valid.
In a structure, characterized by Aristotle, from the blend of an overall assertion (the significant reason) and a particular assertion (the minor reason), an end is derived.
For instance, realizing that all men are mortal (significant reason) and that Socrates is a man (minor reason), we may truly infer that Socrates is mortal. Syllogistic contentions are typically addressed in a three-line structure and the example is given below.
All individuals are mortal.
Socrates is an individual.
Along these lines, Socrates is mortal.
In days of yore, two opponent syllogistic hypotheses existed: Aristotelian logic and Stoic logic. From the Middle Ages onwards, clear cut logic and logic were normally utilized reciprocally. This article is concerned uniquely with this verifiable use.
The logic was at the center of chronicled deductive thinking, whereby realities are dictated by joining existing explanations, as opposed to inductive thinking in which realities are controlled by rehashed perceptions.
Inside a scholastic setting, the logic was supplanted by first-request predicate rationale following crafted by Gottlob Frege, specifically his Begriffsschrift (Concept Script; 1879). Be that as it may, arguments stay valuable in certain conditions, and for general-crowd acquaintances with rationale.
How To Solve Syllogism Questions
These sorts of inquiries are basically outlined. They contain commonly at least two explanations. These assertions are then trailed by various ends. In light of the assertions, you need to discover the genuineness of the ends.
In basic words, you need to find that from the given statements. which ends sensibly follows them. The most widely utilized methodology in settling these kinds of inquiries is the Venn outline approach.
What Is Venn Diagram
A Venn chart may likewise be known as an essential graph, set outline or rationale outline. It is an outline that shows all conceivable consistent relations between a limited assortment of various sets.
These charts portray components as focuses in the plane, and sets as districts inside shut bends. A Venn outline comprises of various covering shut bends, normally circles, each addressing a set.
The focuses inside a bend marked S address components of the set S, while focuses outside the limit address components not in the set S.
This fits natural perceptions; for instance, the arrangement of all components that are individuals from the two sets S and T meant S ∩ T and read “the crossing point of S and T”, is addressed outwardly by the space of cover of the districts S and T.
Now you understand that what is syllogism let us discuss some syllogism questions and answers with the explanation of each and every and every single question.
We will share these question answers in different categories according to examinations.
Syllogism Questions For SBI PO, Bank PO, IBPS PO
- Statements: Some bats are balls.
No ball is a wicket.
Conclusions: I. Some wickets are not bat.
II. All wickets being bat is a possibility.
| A | Conclusion I follows |
| B | Conclusion II follows |
| C | Either conclusion I or conclusion II follows |
| D | Neither conclusion I or conclusion II follows |
| E | Both conclusion I and conclusion II follow |
Answer is B.
Explanation-
A few bats are balls (I) + No ball is a wicket (E) = I + E = O = Some bats are not wickets. Subsequently, the end I don’t follow. Be that as it may, the chance in II exists. In this way, end II follows. Subsequently, alternative B is right.
2. Statements: All lions are tigers.
No tiger is the dog.
All dogs are cats.
Conclusions: I. All lions are cats.
II. Some cats are tigers.
| A | Neither I nor II follows |
| B | Only I follows |
| C | Either I or II follows |
| D | Both I and II follow |
| E | Only II follows |
Explanation-
The class ‘lions’ is in Statement 1 and ‘felines’ is in Statement 3 and the connection or center term is accessible in Statement 2 which is an E type articulation.
Unmistakably, utilizing these we can’t have A-type end. C1, obviously, doesn’t follow.
Applying a similar rationale, we can’t get a positive end utilizing Statement 2 and Statement 3. C2 doesn’t follow by the same token. Alternative An is henceforth the right answer.
3. Statements: Some boys are girls.
Some girls are women.
All women are men.
Conclusions: I. Some men are girls. II.
All boys being men is a possibility.
| A | Neither I nor II follows |
| B | Only I follows |
| C | Either I or II follows |
| D | Both I and II follow |
| E | Only II follows |
Explanation-
A few young ladies are ladies + All ladies are men = Some young ladies are men. Plainly, C1 follows.
Here, no regrettable articulation is given among the assertions. Plainly, conceivable outcomes between classes do exist. C2 follows too.
Alternative D is consequently the right answer.
4. Statements : No tea is coffee.
No milk is tea.
Conclusions : I. No coffee is milk.
II. All milk are coffee.
| A | Conclusion I follows |
| B | Conclusion II follows |
| C | Either conclusion I or conclusion II follows |
| D | Neither conclusion I or conclusion II follows |
| E | Both conclusion I and conclusion II follow |
Explanation-
E + E = No conclusion through deduction method.
Thus, neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows.
Hence, option D is correct.
5. Statements : All tables are chairs.
No chair is a couch.
Conclusions : I. At least some couches are chairs.
II. No table is a couch.
| A | Conclusion I follows |
| B | Conclusion II follows |
| C | Either conclusion I or conclusion II follows |
| D | Neither conclusion I or conclusion II follows |
| E | Both conclusion I and conclusion II follow |
Explanation-
No seat is a sofa (E) – banter – No love seat is a seat (E).Hence end I doesn’t follow.
Once more, All tables are seats (A) + No seat is a lounge chair (E) = A + E = E = No table is a sofa.
Consequently end II follows.
Consequently, alternative B is right.
6. Statements: Some taxes are direct.
Some taxes are indirect.
All indirect are wealth.
Conclusions:I. Some direct are indirect.
II. All wealth are direct.
| A | Only C1 follows |
| B | Only C2 follows |
| C | Both C1 and C2 follow |
| D | Neither C1 nor C2 follows |
| E | Either C1 or C2 follows |
Explanation-
The center term isn’t appropriated even once, a distinct end among ‘immediate’ and ’roundabout’ can’t be gotten from them. C1, thus, doesn’t follow.
We can see that ‘riches’ and ‘direct’ classes exist in various explanations and consequently we can’t infer A sort determination out of a blend of I+I+A type proclamations. C2, consequently, doesn’t follow by the same token.
Choice D is henceforth the right answer.
7. Statements: No story is a fiction.
Some fictions are poetries.
All fictions are novels.
Conclusions: I. Some poetries not being novels is a possibility.
II. Some poetries are not stories.
| A | Only C1 follows |
| B | Only C2 follows |
| C | Both C1 and C2 follow |
| D | Neither C1 nor C2 follows |
| E | Either C1 or C2 follows |
Explanation-
Opposite of S2 – Some verses are fictions + All fictions are books = (I + A) = ‘A few verses are books’. Presently, when a few verses are books, what are different verses? They might be books too or they may not be books. Obviously, ‘A few verses not being books is a chance’. C1 thus follows.
Opposite of S2 – Some verses are fictions + Converse of S1 – No fiction is a story = (I + E) = ‘A few verses are not stories’ which is really the given end 2. C2, consequently, follows.
Alternative C is consequently the right answer.
8. Statements: Roshni is a teacher.
Roshni is a student.
No student is a scholar.
Conclusions:I. Some students are teachers.
II. Roshni is not a scholar.
| A | Only C1 follows |
| B | Only C2 follows |
| C | Both C1 and C2 follow |
| D | Neither C1 nor C2 follows |
| E | Either C1 or C2 follows |
Explanation-
Opposite of S2 – Some understudies are Roshni + Roshni is an educator = (I + A) = Some understudies are instructors. C1, subsequently, follows.
Roshni is an understudy + No understudy is a researcher = (A + E) = Roshni isn’t a researcher. C2, subsequently, follows also.
Unmistakably, choice C is the right answer.
9. Statements : Mr. Verma likes apples.
Apples are highly priced.
Some highly priced things are sweet.
Conclusions :I. Some highly priced things are liked by Mr. Verma.
II. Some apples are sweet.
| A | Only C1 follows |
| B | Only C2 follows |
| C | Both C1 and C2 follow |
| D | Neither C1 nor C2 follows |
| E | Either C1 or C2 follows |
Explanation-
Mr. Verma likes apples + Apples are profoundly valued = (A + A) = Mr. Verma prefers profoundly evaluated things. The opposite of the above end = Some profoundly valued things are preferred by Mr. Verma. Consequently, C1 follows.
We can see here that the center term between these classes ‘Apples’ and ‘Sweet’ isn’t disseminated even once. What’s more, subsequently, we can’t conclude an unequivocal end between these two classes. C2, henceforth, doesn’t follow.
Alternative An is thus the right answer.
10. Statements: A few of my friends are teachers.
Teachers are rude.
Some rude persons are good at heart.
Conclusions: I. A few of my friends are good at heart.
II. Some rude persons may not be teachers.
| A | Only C1 follows |
| B | Only C2 follows |
| C | Both C1 and C2 follow |
| D | Neither C1 nor C2 follows |
| E | Either C1 or C2 follows |
Try to solve it from yourself, trust me this is an easy one.
Syllogism Questions For SBI Clerk
- Statements : All circles are squares.
Some squares are rectangles.
Conclusions :I. All rectangles being squares is a possibility.
II. All circles are rectangles.
| A | Only conclusion I follows |
| B | Only conclusion II follows |
| C | Both conclusions I and II follow |
| D | Neither conclusion I nor II follows |
| E | Either conclusion I or II follows |
Explanation-
As there is no adverse assertions, the chance exists in ends I. Thus, ends I follows.
Here, we can see that the class ‘squares’ isn’t being circulated even once in both of the assertions, subsequently, end II doesn’t follow.
Choice A is consequently the right answer.
2. Statements : Only a few teachers are doctors.
0% teachers are lawyers.
Conclusions :I. All lawyers are teachers.
II. Some doctors are not lawyers.
| A | If only conclusion I follows |
| B | If only conclusion II follows |
| C | If neither conclusion I nor II follows |
| D | If both conclusions I and II follow |
| E | if either conclusion I or II follows |
Explanation-
Opposite of S2 (No educators are legal advisors) ⇒ No legal counselors are instructors. Obviously, C1 doesn’t follow.
Utilizing opposite of S1 and S2, we get Some specialists are educators (I) + No instructors are legal counselors (E) ⇒ Some specialists are not legal advisors. Obviously, C2 follows.
Alternative B is subsequently the right answer.
3. Statements: Only tables are chairs.
Some tables are desks.
Conclusions:I. All chairs are desks.
II. Some desks are tables.
| A | Only conclusion I follows |
| B | Only conclusion II follows |
| C | Both conclusions I and II follow |
| D | Neither conclusion I nor II follows |
| E | Either conclusion I or II follows |
Explanation-
Just tables are seats’ or ‘All seats are tables’ (A) + ‘A few tables are work areas’ (I) ⇒ No end among seat and work areas since seats can’t be others. Obviously, C1 doesn’t follow.
Opposite of S2 (Some tables are work areas) ⇒ Some work areas are tables. Plainly, C2 follows.
Alternative B is thus the right answer.
4. Statements : All apples are bananas.
All bananas are sweet.
Conclusions :I. Only some apples are sweet.
II. Some bananas are apples.
| A | If only conclusion I follow |
| B | If only conclusion II follow |
| C | If neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows |
| D | If both the conclusions follow |
| E | if either conclusion I or conclusion II follows. |
Explanation-
All apples are bananas (A) + All bananas are sweet (A) = A + A = A = All apples are sweet.
End I doesn’t follows
End II is Converse of the primary Premise.
Consequently, Conclusion II follows.
Consequently, alternative B is right.
5. Statements: All pens are pencils.
No pencil is an eraser.
Conclusions:I. No eraser is a pen.
II. No pencil is an eraser.
| A | If only conclusion I follow |
| B | If only conclusion II follow |
| C | If neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows |
| D | If both the conclusions follow |
| E | if either conclusion I or conclusion II follows. |
Explanation-
All pens are pencils (A) + No pencil is an eraser (E) = A + E = E = “No pen is an eraser”
This is Conclusion II.
End I is the Converse of it for example
No eraser is a pen.
Subsequently, both end I and II follow.
Henceforth, alternative D is right.
6. Statements: No cream is lotion.
Not a single lotion is oil.
Every oil is shampoo.
Conclusions: I. Some shampoos which are oil are cream as well.
II. No cream is an oil.
| A | Only C1 follows |
| B | Either C1 or C2 follows |
| C | Both C1 and C2 follow |
| D | None follows |
| E | None of these |
Explanation-
In Statement 1 and 2, the center term ‘cream’ is conveyed twice and in this way even subsequent to speaking both of the sentence we will not have the option to track down a distinct end out of these two. Thusly, we can’t determine an unequivocal connection among ‘oil’ and ‘cream’.
No cream is an oil. Following the rationale clarified above, we can unmistakably say that C2 doesn’t follow by the same token. Between the two, none follow. Choice D is subsequently the right answer.
7. Statements: No phone is an airplane.
All ships are airplanes.
Conclusions: I. No ship is phone.
II. At least some airplanes are phones.
| A | Only conclusion I follows |
| B | Only conclusion II follows |
| C | Either conclusion I or II follows |
| D | Both conclusions I and II follows |
| E | Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows |
Explanation-
Utilizing articulation I and II, we get All boats are planes + Converse of ‘No telephone is a plane’ = No boat is plane. Henceforth, end I follows.
Utilizing proclamation I, we get Converse of ‘No telephone is a plane’ = No plane is the telephone. Thus, end II doesn’t follow. Alternative An is thus the right answer.
8. Statements: No curtain is an element.
All elements are pillows.
Conclusions: I. All pillows being curtains is a possibility.
II. Some elements are definitely not curtains.
| A | Only conclusion I follows |
| B | Only conclusion II follows |
| C | Either conclusion I or II follows |
| D | Both conclusions I and II follows |
| E | Neither conclusion I nor II follows |
Explanation-
No window ornament is a component (E) + All components are cushions (A) = E + A = O* = Some pads are not shades. Subsequently the chance in I doesn’t exist.
Once more, No drapery is a component (E) → transformation → No component is a blind (E) → suggestion → Some components are unquestionably not window ornaments. Thus II follows.
Thusly, alternative B is right.
9. Statements: A few balloons are not toys.
All toys are bear.
No bear is wild.
Conclusions:I. No wild is a toy.
II. No balloon is wild.
| A | Only C1 follows |
| B | Either C1 or C2 follows |
| C | Both C1 and C2 follow |
| D | None follows |
| E | None of these |
No wild is a toy.
From S1 and S2,
All toys are bear (A) + No bear is wild (E) = No toy is wild or No wild is a toy.
C1 henceforth follows.
No inflatable is wild.
Unmistakably, S1 in which the class ‘inflatables’ exists is an O type explanation, we can’t infer a clear relationship of it with some other assertion.
Plainly, C2 doesn’t follow. Clearly, just C1 follows. Choice An is subsequently the right answer.
10. Statements: No laptop is apple.
Not a single apple is mobile.
Every mobile is tablet.
Conclusions:I. Some tablets which are mobiles are laptops as well.
II. Some tablets are not apples.
| A | Only C2 follows |
| B | Either C1 or C2 follows |
| C | Both C1 and C2 follow |
| D | None follows |
| E | None of these |
Explanation-
A few tablets which are mobiles are workstations also. On the off chance that we notice the given assertions, we can track down that in Statements 1 and 2, the center term ‘apple’ is circulated twice, and consequently even subsequent to bantering both of the sentences, we will not have the option to track down an unmistakable end out of these two. Thusly, we can’t determine a clear connection between portable among ‘versatile’ and ‘PC’.
C1 henceforth doesn’t follow.
A few tablets are not apples.
From S2 and S3,
Not a solitary apple is versatile (E) + Every portable is a tablet (A) = Some tablets are not apples.
Plainly, C2 follows. Among all, solitary C2 follows. Alternative An is subsequently the right answer.
Syllogism Questions For SSC
We have shared lots of syllogism questions in this article with explanations. Now please try to solve these questions from yourself. Don’t worry we mention the answers you only need to know that why that is the correct answer to that question. Give it a try.
- Statements: Some actors are singers.
- All the singers are dancers.
Conclusions
- Some actors are dancers.
- No singer is an actor.
| A | Only (1) conclusion follows |
| B | Only (2) conclusion follows |
| C | Either (1) or (2) follows |
| D | Neither (1) nor (2) follows |
| E | Both (1) and (2) follow |
Answer- A
2. Statements: All cups are books.
All books are shirts.
Conclusions
- Some cups are not shirts.
- Some shirts are cups.
| A | Only (1) conclusion follows |
| B | Only (2) conclusion follows |
| C | Neither (1) nor (2) follows |
| D | Both (1) and (2) follows |
Answer- C
3. Statements: Some questions are answers.
Some answers are writers.
All the writers are poets.
Conclusions
- Some writers are answers.
- Some poets are questions.
- All the questions are poets.
- Some poets are answers.
| A | Only (1) and (2) |
| B | Only (1) and (4) |
| C | Only (1) and (3) |
| D | Only (2) and (4) |
Answer: Option B
4. Statements: Some keys are staplers.
Some staplers are stickers.
All the stickers are pens.
Conclusions
- Some pens are staplers.
- Some stickers are keys.
- No sticker is key.
- Some staplers are keys.
| A | Only (1) and (2) |
| B | Only (2) and (4) |
| C | Only (2) and (3) |
| D | Only (1) and (4) and either (2) or (3) |
Answer: Option D
5. Statements: All men are vertebrates.
Some mammals are vertebrates.
Conclusions
- All men are mammals.
- All mammals are men.
- Some vertebrates are mammals.
- All vertebrates are men.
| A | Only (4) |
| B | Only (2) |
| C | Only (3) |
| D | Only (1) |
| E | Only (1) and (3) |
6. Statements: All green is blue.
All blue is white.
Conclusions
- Some blue is green.
- Some white is green.
- Some green is not white.
- All white is blue.
| A | Only (1) and (2) |
| B | Only (1) and (3) |
| C | Only (1) and (4) |
| D | Only (2) and (4) |
Answer: Option A
7. Statements: No door is a dog.
All the dogs are cats.
Conclusions
- No door is a cat.
- No cat is a door.
- Some cats are dogs.
- All the cats are dogs.
| A | Only (2) and (4) |
| B | Only (1) and (3) |
| C | Only (3) and (4) |
| D | Only (3) |
| E | All four |
Answer: Option D
8. Statements: Some mangoes are yellow.
Some tixo are mangoes.
Conclusions
- Some mangoes are green.
- Tixo is yellow.
| A | Only (1) conclusion follows |
| B | Only (2) conclusion follows |
| C | Either (1) or (2) follows |
| D | Neither (1) nor (2) follows |
| E | Both (1) and (2) follow |
Answer: Option D
9. Statements: All the harmoniums are instruments.
All the instruments are flutes.
Conclusions
- All the flutes are instruments.
- All the harmoniums are flutes.
| A | Only (1) conclusion follows |
| B | Only (2) conclusion follows |
| C | Either (1) or (2) follows |
| D | Neither (1) nor (2) follows |
| E | Both (1) and (2) follow |
Answer: Option B
10. Statements: All the locks are keys.
All the keys are bats.
Some watches are bats.
Conclusions
- Some bats are locks.
- Some watches are keys.
- All the keys are locks.
| A | Only (1) and (2) |
| B | Only (1) |
| C | Only (2) |
| D | Only (1) and (3) |
Answer: Option B
Final Words On Syllogism Questions
The Syllogism Questions are very easy to solve if you can quickly imagine the situation in your mind. For perfection, you need to do practice as much as you can because practice makes a human being perfect.
Check more articles here.